MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Michael Geerts [290th] vs Altug Celikbilek [512th] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

Head To Head: Geerts 1 - 0 Celikbilek

They have played 3 sets in total, with Geerts winning 2 and Celikbilek winning 1. The last match between Geerts and Celikbilek was at the Lille Challenger, 31-03-2023, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Michael Geerts getting the victory 6-7(6) 6-4 6-2.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Michael Geerts 1
Altug Celikbilek 0
Geerts vs Celikbilek H2H Profile
Geerts Stats Celikbilek
55% (16-13) YTD Win/Loss 0% (0-0)
1 Head-to-Head 0
290 Ranking 512
212 Highest Rank 154
30 Age 28
R Plays R
10 Titles 9
57% (390-296) Career Total W/L 57% (382-283)
$34,000 Career Prize Money $231,155
1 Indoor H2H 0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Geerts VS Celikbilek H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-7(6) 6-4 6-2
cross
Michael Geerts
Player
Altug Celikbilek
61% ( 60 of 98)
1st Serve %
64% ( 57 of 89)
13
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
3
75% ( 45 of 60)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 40 of 57)
61% ( 23 of 38)
2nd Serve Won
56% ( 18 of 32)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
31% ( 30 of 98)
Rtn Points Won
35% ( 31 of 89)
99
Total Points Won
88

Geerts VS Celikbilek H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Geerts Vs Celikbilek H2H Stats
Michael Geerts Geerts Stats Altug Celikbilek Celikbilek
1 H2H Matches 0
2 Sets Won 1
18 Games Won 13
13 Aces (Total) 12
1 Total Double Faults 3
2:3:20 Average Match Time 2:3:20
61% (60/98) 1st Serve % 64% (57/89)
75% (45/60) 1st Serve Win % 70% (40/57)
61% (23/38) 2nd Serve Win % 56% (18/32)
67% (4/6) Break Points Won % (Total) 25% (1/4)
35% (31/89) Return Points Win % 31% (30/98)
100% (1/1) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/1)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/1) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 100% (1/1)
100% (1/1) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/1)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (1/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 100% (1/1)
100% (1/1) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (0/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Michael Geerts vs Altug Celikbilek Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Geerts 1 - 0 Celikbilek

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Geerts has won 46.58% of points on their second serve, while Celikbilek has won 38.95%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Geerts, in recent form, has won 45.3% of their opponent's second serve points, while Celikbilek has won 49.42%. The same stats for first serve returns are 24.38% and 25.26% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Geerts has saved 52.05% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Celikbilek has saved 45.28% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Geerts has won 58.62% of matches played (W/L 51/ 36), with Celikbilek winning 76.6% (W/L 36/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Geerts has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 181/ 110), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Celikbilek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 285/ 186), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 30/ 40).
  • Player level: In the last year, Geerts has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 49.06% of matches (W/L 26/ 27), where as Celikbilek has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 78.57% of matches (W/L 33/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Geerts winning 1 times and Celikbilek being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Geerts winning 2 and Celikbilek winning 1. The last match between Geerts and Celikbilek was at the Lille Challenger, 31-03-2023, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Michael Geerts getting the victory 6-7(6) 6-4 6-2.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:3:20.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Geerts and Celikbilek have played a deciding set 1 times, with Geerts winning 1 times and Celikbilek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Geerts winning 0, and Celikbilek 1.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Geerts has played against opponents with an average rank of 213.54 while Celikbilek has played against players with an average rank of 326.72.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Geerts has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Celikbilek has won 70% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Geerts has converted 34.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Celikbilek has converted 41.25% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Michael Geerts Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    QF
    cross
    Ricardas Berankis
    Player
    Michael Geerts
    62% ( 64 of 103)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 69 of 104)
    12
    Aces
    12
    5
    Double Faults
    3
    75% ( 48 of 64)
    1st Serve Won
    70% ( 48 of 69)
    46% ( 18 of 39)
    2nd Serve Won
    43% ( 15 of 35)
    40% ( 4 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    44% ( 4 of 9)
    36% ( 37 of 103)
    Rtn Points Won
    39% ( 41 of 104)
    107
    Total Points Won
    100
    L
    6-4 4-6 7-6(5) H2H
    R2
    cross
    Michael Geerts
    Player
    Luca Potenza
    51% ( 49 of 96)
    1st Serve %
    56% ( 62 of 110)
    9
    Aces
    7
    10
    Double Faults
    3
    86% ( 42 of 49)
    1st Serve Won
    65% ( 40 of 62)
    32% ( 15 of 47)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 23 of 48)
    40% ( 4 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 4 of 8)
    41% ( 39 of 96)
    Rtn Points Won
    43% ( 47 of 110)
    104
    Total Points Won
    102
    W
    2-6 7-6(5) 6-2 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Michael Geerts
    Player
    Adil Kalyanpur
    55% ( 23 of 42)
    1st Serve %
    78% ( 36 of 46)
    2
    Aces
    0
    0
    Double Faults
    0
    74% ( 17 of 23)
    1st Serve Won
    47% ( 17 of 36)
    68% ( 13 of 19)
    2nd Serve Won
    50% ( 5 of 10)
    100% ( 5 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    29% ( 12 of 42)
    Rtn Points Won
    52% ( 24 of 46)
    54
    Total Points Won
    34
    W
    6-1 6-3 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Mika Brunold
    Player
    Michael Geerts
    65% ( 68 of 105)
    1st Serve %
    63% ( 52 of 83)
    0
    Aces
    2
    3
    Double Faults
    2
    59% ( 40 of 68)
    1st Serve Won
    60% ( 31 of 52)
    57% ( 21 of 37)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 15 of 31)
    67% ( 4 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    27% ( 3 of 11)
    42% ( 44 of 105)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 37 of 83)
    98
    Total Points Won
    90
    L
    2-6 6-4 6-2 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Michael Geerts
    Player
    Giulio Zeppieri
    60% ( 25 of 42)
    1st Serve %
    62% ( 33 of 53)
    2
    Aces
    3
    0
    Double Faults
    3
    88% ( 22 of 25)
    1st Serve Won
    61% ( 20 of 33)
    82% ( 14 of 17)
    2nd Serve Won
    55% ( 11 of 20)
    60% ( 3 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    14% ( 6 of 42)
    Rtn Points Won
    42% ( 22 of 53)
    58
    Total Points Won
    37
    W
    6-3 6-3 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Dalibor Svrcina
    Player
    Michael Geerts
    69% ( 33 of 48)
    1st Serve %
    56% ( 30 of 54)
    0
    Aces
    3
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    76% ( 25 of 33)
    1st Serve Won
    50% ( 15 of 30)
    47% ( 7 of 15)
    2nd Serve Won
    38% ( 9 of 24)
    71% ( 5 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    33% ( 16 of 48)
    Rtn Points Won
    56% ( 30 of 54)
    62
    Total Points Won
    40
    L
    6-3 6-1 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Michael Geerts
    Player
    Robin Bertrand
    66% ( 29 of 44)
    1st Serve %
    57% ( 26 of 46)
    0
    Aces
    2
    1
    Double Faults
    1
    79% ( 23 of 29)
    1st Serve Won
    50% ( 13 of 26)
    53% ( 8 of 15)
    2nd Serve Won
    30% ( 6 of 20)
    83% ( 5 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    30% ( 13 of 44)
    Rtn Points Won
    59% ( 27 of 46)
    58
    Total Points Won
    32
    W
    6-1 6-1 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Michael Geerts
    Player
    Paul Jubb
    50% ( 20 of 40)
    1st Serve %
    59% ( 29 of 49)
    1
    Aces
    0
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    85% ( 17 of 20)
    1st Serve Won
    52% ( 15 of 29)
    80% ( 16 of 20)
    2nd Serve Won
    45% ( 9 of 20)
    50% ( 4 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 2)
    18% ( 7 of 40)
    Rtn Points Won
    51% ( 25 of 49)
    58
    Total Points Won
    31
    W
    6-2 6-1 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Alejandro Juan Mano
    Player
    Michael Geerts
    84% ( 41 of 49)
    1st Serve %
    48% ( 21 of 44)
    0
    Aces
    3
    1
    Double Faults
    4
    59% ( 24 of 41)
    1st Serve Won
    67% ( 14 of 21)
    63% ( 5 of 8)
    2nd Serve Won
    26% ( 6 of 23)
    33% ( 3 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    17% ( 1 of 6)
    41% ( 20 of 49)
    Rtn Points Won
    55% ( 24 of 44)
    53
    Total Points Won
    40
    L
    6-2 7-6(2) H2H
    R1
    cross
    Michael Geerts
    Player
    Michiel De Krom
    49% ( 38 of 77)
    1st Serve %
    45% ( 31 of 69)
    0
    Aces
    2
    5
    Double Faults
    2
    66% ( 25 of 38)
    1st Serve Won
    71% ( 22 of 31)
    56% ( 22 of 39)
    2nd Serve Won
    42% ( 16 of 38)
    67% ( 4 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    30% ( 3 of 10)
    39% ( 30 of 77)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 31 of 69)
    78
    Total Points Won
    68
    W
    7-6(0) 6-4 H2H

    Altug Celikbilek Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    SF
    cross
    Yanki Erel
    Player
    Altug Celikbilek
    50% ( 1 of 2)
    1st Serve %
    80% ( 4 of 5)
    -
    Aces
    -
    -
    Double Faults
    -
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    1st Serve Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    2nd Serve Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    50% ( 1 of 2)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    0% ( 0 of 2)
    Rtn Points Won
    80% ( 4 of 5)
    6
    Total Points Won
    1
    L
    1-0 ret. H2H
    QF
    cross
    Altug Celikbilek
    Player
    Pietro Marino
    60% ( 31 of 52)
    1st Serve %
    58% ( 35 of 60)
    5
    Aces
    5
    3
    Double Faults
    2
    74% ( 23 of 31)
    1st Serve Won
    54% ( 19 of 35)
    48% ( 10 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    32% ( 8 of 25)
    38% ( 5 of 13)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 2 of 4)
    37% ( 19 of 52)
    Rtn Points Won
    55% ( 33 of 60)
    66
    Total Points Won
    46
    W
    6-4 6-1 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Altug Celikbilek
    Player
    Sekou Bangoura
    61% ( 35 of 57)
    1st Serve %
    56% ( 31 of 55)
    6
    Aces
    2
    3
    Double Faults
    0
    77% ( 27 of 35)
    1st Serve Won
    65% ( 20 of 31)
    55% ( 12 of 22)
    2nd Serve Won
    42% ( 10 of 24)
    80% ( 4 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 2 of 2)
    32% ( 18 of 57)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 25 of 55)
    64
    Total Points Won
    48
    W
    6-3 7-5 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Altug Celikbilek
    Player
    Maxence Bertimon
    58% ( 31 of 53)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 37 of 56)
    5
    Aces
    5
    1
    Double Faults
    4
    81% ( 25 of 31)
    1st Serve Won
    62% ( 23 of 37)
    45% ( 10 of 22)
    2nd Serve Won
    32% ( 6 of 19)
    63% ( 5 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    40% ( 2 of 5)
    34% ( 18 of 53)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 27 of 56)
    62
    Total Points Won
    47
    W
    6-3 6-4 H2H
    F
    cross
    Kimmer Coppejans
    Player
    Altug Celikbilek
    57% ( 63 of 111)
    1st Serve %
    57% ( 58 of 102)
    9
    Aces
    7
    4
    Double Faults
    3
    76% ( 48 of 63)
    1st Serve Won
    64% ( 37 of 58)
    40% ( 19 of 48)
    2nd Serve Won
    48% ( 21 of 44)
    67% ( 6 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    31% ( 4 of 13)
    40% ( 44 of 111)
    Rtn Points Won
    43% ( 44 of 102)
    111
    Total Points Won
    102
    L
    7-5 5-7 6-2 H2H
    SF
    cross
    Altug Celikbilek
    Player
    Kenny de Schepper
    63% ( 42 of 67)
    1st Serve %
    75% ( 65 of 87)
    3
    Aces
    2
    1
    Double Faults
    0
    76% ( 32 of 42)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 41 of 65)
    56% ( 14 of 25)
    2nd Serve Won
    41% ( 9 of 22)
    33% ( 4 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    60% ( 3 of 5)
    31% ( 21 of 67)
    Rtn Points Won
    43% ( 37 of 87)
    83
    Total Points Won
    71
    W
    7-6(4) 6-4 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Altug Celikbilek
    Player
    Francesco Maestrelli
    67% ( 28 of 42)
    1st Serve %
    70% ( 28 of 40)
    5
    Aces
    5
    2
    Double Faults
    1
    75% ( 21 of 28)
    1st Serve Won
    64% ( 18 of 28)
    57% ( 8 of 14)
    2nd Serve Won
    0% ( 0 of 12)
    100% ( 5 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    31% ( 13 of 42)
    Rtn Points Won
    55% ( 22 of 40)
    51
    Total Points Won
    31
    W
    6-2 6-2 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Altug Celikbilek
    Player
    Peter Buldorini
    74% ( 35 of 47)
    1st Serve %
    63% ( 31 of 49)
    4
    Aces
    2
    3
    Double Faults
    6
    83% ( 29 of 35)
    1st Serve Won
    58% ( 18 of 31)
    50% ( 6 of 12)
    2nd Serve Won
    28% ( 5 of 18)
    80% ( 4 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 3)
    26% ( 12 of 47)
    Rtn Points Won
    53% ( 26 of 49)
    61
    Total Points Won
    35
    W
    6-2 6-1 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Altug Celikbilek
    Player
    Keshav Chopra
    56% ( 34 of 61)
    1st Serve %
    67% ( 56 of 83)
    3
    Aces
    1
    5
    Double Faults
    2
    68% ( 23 of 34)
    1st Serve Won
    45% ( 25 of 56)
    56% ( 15 of 27)
    2nd Serve Won
    44% ( 12 of 27)
    41% ( 7 of 17)
    Break Points Won
    60% ( 3 of 5)
    38% ( 23 of 61)
    Rtn Points Won
    55% ( 46 of 83)
    84
    Total Points Won
    60
    W
    3-6 6-0 6-1 H2H
    Q2
    W
    6-1 6-4 H2H
    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Geerts & Celikbilek Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    Michael Geerts Geerts Stats Altug Celikbilek Celikbilek
    57% (390/296) Win/Loss 57% (382/283)
    56% (881/682) Sets Win/Loss 55% (852/690)
    52% (7690/7000) Games Win/Loss 52% (7483/6938)
    0.3 Aces Per Game 0.38
    2172 Aces Total 2685
    0.21 Double Faults Per Game 0.26
    1476 Total Double Faults 1819
    1:22:57 Average Match Time 1:13:40
    467.48 Average Opponent Rank 482.95
    59% (22096/37730) 1st Serve % 58% (21317/36949)
    71% (15625/22096) 1st Serve Win % 71% (15067/21317)
    51% (7944/15634) 2nd Serve Win % 48% (7571/15632)
    42% (1569/3734) Break Points Won % (Total) 45% (1624/3636)
    39% (14974/38102) Return Points Win % 40% (14655/36339)
    57% (384/674) Best of 3 Sets Win % 58% (375/652)
    0% (0/1) Best of 5 Sets Win % 57% (4/7)
    50% (106/212) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 48% (89/185)
    47% (95/201) Deciding Set Win % 58% (122/212)
    86% (402/345) 1st Set Won, Won Match 85% (372/315)
    14% (402/57) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 15% (372/57)
    16% (284/45) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 23% (293/66)

    Potential H2H Matches This Week For Michael Geerts

    Abidjan 2 Challenger

    Geerts vs Shah H2H, could play in The Quarterfinals

    Geerts vs Baadi H2H, could play in The Quarterfinals

    Geerts vs Compagnucci H2H, could play in The Second round

    Geerts vs Kellovsky H2H, could play in The Second round

    View full predicted draw for Geerts

    Other Predictions

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    21 Apr
    flag
    11:00
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    21 Apr
    flag
    12:30
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    21 Apr
    flag
    17:00
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    21 Apr
    flag
    18:30
    Prediction

    Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid

    flag
    21 Apr
    flag
    18:30
    Prediction
    • Loading news...